Cases 51 - 60 of 2,005
Pedigo v. Leman et al
as 4:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
David Edmond Pedigo
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Leman, Correctional Officer Shine, Correctional Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 5:2023cv05223
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Carol Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Wealth Management/Arvest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. United Industries Ultra Board
as 5:2023cv05221
Plaintiff:
Vanessa C Smith
Defendant:
United Industries Ultra Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith et al v. Kendricks, M.D. et al
as 5:2023cv05220
Plaintiff:
Vanessa C Smith
Defendant:
Dr. John Kendricks, M.D. and John Latour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Smith v. Tallant et al
as 4:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Jana Tallant and Chief Deputy Joey Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Gelco Fleet Trust et al
as 4:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
David Smith and Kim Smith
Defendant:
Gelco Fleet Trust and Thomas Daniel Perrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Smith v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Deric C Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Kathy L Smith, Dexter Payne and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
