Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Weinberg v. Healey et al
as 1:2026cv13362
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Weinberg
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Lisa Wolfe, Stanley Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. EIFE et al
as 3:2026cv08550
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STEPHEN EIFE, RICHARD NOCELLA, ERIC SPERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Mawule Tepe v. Michael Sharp, et al
as 26-5002
Plaintiff:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant:
MICHAEL SHARP, CONNOR MCCARTHY BLAIR, ERIK HALVORSON and others
Spero et al v. Blue Circle Foods, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv08848
Plaintiff:
David Spero and Anas Ryadi
Defendant:
Blue Circle Foods, LLC doing business as Changing Seas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv08769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tepe v. Sharp et al
as 3:2025cv00452
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Michael Sharp, Connor McCarthy Blair, Erik Halvorson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv06964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. Nixon, et al.
as 25-4920
Plaintiff:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant:
THOMAS J. NIXON, Judge of Alameda County Superior Court, STEPHEN KAUS, Former Judge at State Court, KARIN SCHWARTZ, Judge at State Court and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
