Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Spurlock v. Howard et al
as 0:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jerry Spurlock
Defendant:
Sean Howard, Jamie Campbell, James Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spurlock et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2023cv04429
Plaintiff:
Walter Spurlock and Andre Guibert
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Airport Commission of the City & County of San Francisco and Jeff Littlefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Moore et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Cayce Moore and Jimmy Click
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jorden Brown v. Samuel Giles, et al
as 23-3142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDEN BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL GILES, ERIC SPURLOCK, In his individual capacity, VILLAGE OF COAL GROVE, OH and others
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arnold v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold
Defendant:
Anthony Spurlock and Julie Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
