Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sherice Sargent, et al v. School District of Philadelphia, et al
as 22-2493
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHERICE SARGENT, Individually, as next friend of her minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated, MICHELE SHERIDAN, Individually, as next friend of her minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated and JOSHUA MEYER, Individually, as next friend of his minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee: FALLON GIRINI, Individually, as next friend of her minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
3M Co, et alIn re: 3M Co, et al
as 20-2864
Petitioner: MICHAEL F. ROMAN, NICHOLAS C. GANGESTAD, In re: 3M CO and others
Respondent: IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Office of the Rhode Island Treasurer on behalf of the Emloyees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island, HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS LOCALS 472 A& 172 WELFARE FUND and others
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ROUSSEAU v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv17090
Defendant: MICHAEL F ROMAN, INGE G THULIN and NICHOLAS C GANGESTAD
Plaintiff: BRUCE ROUSSEAU and 3M COMPANY
Petitioner: IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS, FLOSSBACH VON STORCH INVEST S.A., Sjunde AP-Fonden and others
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SILBERSHER et al v. JANNSEN BIOTECH INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv12107
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Association of New Jersey Rifl, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-3170
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES B. O'CONNOR, in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Lyndhurst Police Department, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BLAKE ELLMAN, ALEXANDER DEMBROWSKI and ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE AND PISTOL CLUBS INC
Appellant: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05073
Plaintiff: STATE OF WISCONSIN , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: INDIVIOR INC. , RECKITTBENCHISER HEALTHCARE (UK) LTD. , INDIVIOR PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04234
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF OHIO , STATE OF VERMONT and others
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?