Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Elouise Bradley v. Wisconsin Department of Childr, et al
as 17-2923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELOUISE BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - CIVIL LITIGATION, JENNIFER SABREE and others
Sabree v. Phakamile-El
as 2:2017cv12884
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Sabree
Defendant:
Bomani Phakamile-El
Counter_claimant:
Bomani Phakamile-El
Counter_defendant:
Eric R. Sabree
Davis et al v. Detroit Downtown Development Authority et al
as 2:2017cv11742
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and D. Etta Wilcoxon
Defendant:
Detroit Downtown Development Authority , Detroit Brownfield Redevelopment Authority , Mike Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bradley v. Wisconsin Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
Elouise Bradley
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, Wisconsin Department of Justice, Jennifer Sabree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Vancamp
as 4:2017cv10637
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams, III, Audrey Arthur, Lawson Love and others
Defendant:
John Vancamp, Timothy Thorland, Richard S. Zeiman and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sharon Brooks, Tiffani Donald, Mia Tate and others
Sheffey v. O'Reilly Rancilio P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv10374
Plaintiff:
Vincent M. Sheffey
Defendant:
O'Reilly Rancilio P.C., Detroit, City of, Michigan, State of and others
Sabree v. Stirling
as 6:2017cv00075
Petitioner:
Muhsin Ahmad Sabree
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SABREE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06347
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SABREE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00802
Plaintiff:
Preston Lee Boyd and Martain Boyd Thompkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H Obama, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
