Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Buchanan v. United States
as 3:2026cv00853
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Buchanan
Respondent:
United States
Interested Party:
USA 2241 and staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Buchanan v. United States of America
as 3:2026cv00786
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Buchanan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Galindo v. Seaboard Foods, et al
as 26-1228
Plaintiff:
AURELIO GALINDO, AKA Aurelio Galindo, Sr.
Defendant:
SEABOARD FOODS, LLC, SEABORD FOODS, LLC, CHAD GROVES and others
Buchanan v. United States
as 2:2026cv01031
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Buchanan
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yeargan v. USA
as 3:2026cv00162
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Malachi Yeargan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parr et al v. BitPay et al
as 4:2025cv00850
Plaintiff:
Reid Parr, Dylan Bost, Bradley Long and others
Defendant:
BitPay, Ran Kim, Huang Hao Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Parr et al v. BitPay et al
as 1:2025cv00387
Plaintiff:
Reid Parr, Dylan Bost, Bradley Long and others
Defendant:
BitPay and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Parr et al v. BitPay et al
as 1:2025cv00388
Plaintiff:
Reid Parr, Dylan Bost, Bradley Long and others
Defendant:
BitPay and John Does 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Galindo (PS) v. Chad et al
as 1:2025cv01773
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Galindo, Sr. and Aurelio Galindo
Defendant:
Samuel Adam Melancom, Groves Chad, Claudia Sheibaum Pardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
