Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Buchanan v. United States
as 2:2026cv01031
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Buchanan
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Galindo v. Seaboard Foods, et al
as 26-1228
Plaintiff:
AURELIO GALINDO, AKA Aurelio Galindo, Sr.
Defendant:
SEABOARD FOODS, LLC, SEABORD FOODS, LLC, CHAD GROVES and others
Yeargan v. USA
as 3:2026cv00162
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Malachi Yeargan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parr et al v. BitPay et al
as 4:2025cv00850
Plaintiff:
Reid Parr, Dylan Bost, Bradley Long and others
Defendant:
BitPay, Ran Kim, Huang Hao Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Parr et al v. BitPay et al
as 1:2025cv00387
Plaintiff:
Reid Parr, Dylan Bost, Bradley Long and others
Defendant:
BitPay and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Parr et al v. BitPay et al
as 1:2025cv00388
Plaintiff:
Reid Parr, Dylan Bost, Bradley Long and others
Defendant:
BitPay and John Does 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Galindo (PS) v. Chad et al
as 1:2025cv01773
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Galindo, Sr. and Aurelio Galindo
Defendant:
Samuel Adam Melancom, Groves Chad, Claudia Sheibaum Pardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. TDCJ, et al
as 1:2025cv00116
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Torres
Respondent:
TDCJ, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torres v. Guerrero
as 1:2025cv00088
Petitioner:
Samuel Adam Torres
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero
Defendant:
TDCJ, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
