Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Samuel Fowler v. Clinton Perry, Jr., et al
as 23-12872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CLINTON PERRY, JR., DEXTER SPIKES, MICHAEL THOMAS and others
FOWLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, DEPUTY WARDEN MEADOR, NURSE PRACTITIONER ND LOMAMI and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, NURSE PRACTITIONER LOMAMI, DEPUTY WARDEN MEADOR and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Korneman et al
as 5:2021cv06002
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lewis Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Smith, B Montgomery, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01610
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Samuel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. N.Y.S. Department of Correction Community Supervision
as 7:2019cv07054
Respondent:
Eric T. Schneiderman and N.Y.S. Department of Correction Community Supervision
Petitioner:
Samuel Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Mayes
as 2:2019cv00029
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lewis Thomas
Defendant:
Bobby Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lieberman et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2018cv04162
Petitioner:
Michael Hansen, Samuel Lewis, Michael Halbrook and others
Respondent:
Greg Scott
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Samuel Fennell
as 18-6075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL LEWIS FENNELL, a/k/a Supreme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
