Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04777
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Bobbi George, Yiwu Lanhome Jewelry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Mash et al
as 1:2017cv00580
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
John Mark Mash and Samuel Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Samuel Moore, Jr. v. Warden Allenwood USP, et al
as 16-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL MOORE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE v. SPAULDING et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Petitioner:
Samuel Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
S. Spaulding and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOORE v. SPAULDING et al
as 1:2015cv00247
Petitioner:
SAMUEL MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
S. SPAULDING and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Officer Brooks and Officer Teal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore and Livera Moore
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Pryor et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
John Pryor and Officer Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruach v. Berts et al
as 0:2012cv01129
Plaintiff:
Pouch Ruach
Defendant:
Ashlee Berts, Bruce W. Julson, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
