Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CORBIN v. JAMES et al
as 5:2022cv04212
Plaintiff:
IAN B. CORBIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN JAMES, ANDREW HOLVECK, JASON KRASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBIN v. HACKLAR et al
as 5:2022cv03406
Plaintiff:
IAN B. CORBIN
Defendant:
GREGORY HACKLAR, MICHAEL LIGHT, II, NURIA DILUZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04464
Defendant:
AERO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
PHILIP CALLIGAN, ASHLEY RIVERA, JAMES P. MCCOOL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02174
Plaintiff:
Philip Calligan, Ashley Rivera, James P. McCool and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Murray v. Graham et al
as 1:2018cv02317
Defendant:
Derek McIlwee, Officer Beal, Richard J Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Murray and Samuel H. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
PeriShip, LLC v. Kanarick et al
as 1:2018cv06445
Plaintiff:
PeriShip, LLC
Defendant:
Samuel Murray and Craig Kanarick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct
Murray v. Samuels et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Murray
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, John A Keller, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Warden USP Beaumont
as 1:2016cv00098
Petitioner:
James Samuel Murray
Respondent:
Warden USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WH Capital, L.L.C. et al v. Memphis Food Group et al
as 2:2014cv02745
Plaintiff:
WH Capital, L.L.C., Waffle House, Inc. and Memphis Food Group
Defendant:
Courtney Carter, Mark LNU and Samuel Murray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
