Cases 51 - 60 of 506
Sostaita v. Sanchez Concrete LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Sostaita
Defendant:
Sanchez Concrete LLC and Alejandro Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Sanchez v. Hicks et al
as 2:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez
Defendant:
Deputy Hicks, Deputy Chase, Deputy Hardwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saul Aguilar-Sanchez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3598
Petitioner:
Saul Aguilar-Sanchez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Malik Rimmer v. Nathan Sanchez, et al
as 22-3364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Malik Rimmer
Defendant / Appellee:
Nathan Sanchez, Police Officer, Justus Knudsen, Police Officer and Sioux City Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Rimmer v. Sanchez et al
as 5:2022cv04058
Plaintiff:
Malik Rimmer
Defendant:
Nathan Sanchez, Justus Knudsen and Sioux City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaisamba-Kanneh v. Dakota County District Court et al
as 0:2022cv02661
Plaintiff:
Alpha L. Kaisamba-Kanneh
Defendant:
Dakota County District Court, Minnesota Guardian Ad Litem Board, Hon. Kathryn Davis Messerich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
