Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Tamar Harvey v. Laura Maughan
as 23-7281
Plaintiff:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant:
SANDRA DAY CONNOR, Grievance Head and LAURA ELIZABETH MAUGHAN, Attorney
DAY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10666
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DAY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harvey v. Maughan et al
as 7:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Tamar Devell Harvey
Defendant:
Laura Elizabeth Maughan and Sandra Day Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Aaron et al
as 5:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Stewart D. Aaron, Sharon Seeley, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Day v. Macy's Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00754
Defendant:
Marshall Field's Chicago, Inc., Macy's Inc. and Macy's State Street, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandra Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunlap v. O'Connor
as 1:2020cv00273
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Dunlap
Defendant:
Sandra Day O'Connor and Sandra Day OConnor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Dunlap v. Sandra O'Connor
as 17-35617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ALLAN DUNLAP
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, The Honorable Former Supreme Court U.S.A. Justice
Chapman v. Hurley
as 6:2017cv01072
Plaintiff:
Tonya R Chapman
Defendant:
Sandra Day Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2016cv09509
Plaintiff:
Michael Day
Defendant:
Gary McCarthy, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation , Jody P. Weis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Day v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07065
Plaintiff:
Sandra Day
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
