Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Thomas Mahoney, III, Tommy Clark, David J. Worley and others
Plaintiff:
Perdue For Senate, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Jean M. Seaver and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86706
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DEAN MORRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandra Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00909
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parks v. Dean et al
as 3:2016cv08298
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Sandra Dean, Mohave, County of, Matthew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05770
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dean
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Owners Advantage LLC v. Ashby et al
as 4:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Owners Advantage LLC
Defendant:
Jeff Ashby and Sandra Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Powell v. Dean et al
as 1:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Powell
Defendant:
Sandra Dean, Kevin Howard and David Favata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Howrey LLP
as 3:2011cv01729
Plaintiff:
Virginia Thomas , Gail Adams , Roderick Casey and others
Defendant:
Howrey LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EMMONS et al v. ARTEVA SPECIALTIES, S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2009cv93314
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HALL EMMONS, JR. and SANDRA DEAN EMMONS
Defendant:
CNA HOLDINGS, INC. , HNA HOLDINGS, INC., FIBER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
