Cases 1 - 10 of 1,056
Rivers v. South Mountain Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
South Mountain Justice Center, Viswanath Dhyaram, Brian Crimp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Augborne v. Malone et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Brit F. Augborne
Defendant:
Metro Police Officer Connor Malone, City of Las Vegas, Motel 6, LLC, Corp, Entity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gold Creek Foods, LLC et al v. City of Dawsonville, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gold Creek Foods, LLC and Gold Creek Processing, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dawsonville, Georgia, John Walden, Caleb Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-60161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hardiman v. McConnell et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cory Dustin Hardiman
Defendant:
Sheriff Joyce McConnell, Vicky Afisov, Sandy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lion Boylston LLC v. Ahyende Sandy
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Lion Boylston LLC
Defendant:
Ahyende Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Etha Jones, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
