Cases 1 - 10 of 47
ULLOA GOMEZ et al v. GIRGIS
as 3:2024cv04602
Plaintiff:
RUDDY ULLOA GOMEZ and SANTIAGO GOMEZ
Defendant:
MONA N. GIRGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ULLOA GOMEZ et al v. GIRGIS
as 2:2024cv04602
Plaintiff:
RUDDY ULLOA GOMEZ and SANTIAGO GOMEZ
Defendant:
MONA N. GIRGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gomez Portorreal v. USA - DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL PLEADINGS TO BE FILED in 22cr10156-PBS.
as 1:2023cv13169
Petitioner:
Santiago Gomez Portorreal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez v. Doe 1 et al
as 7:2022cv05731
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago Morales et al v. Lombardi's Pizza Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06873
Defendant:
Mike Brescio, Gilberto Doe, Israel Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Santiago Gomez, Hector Javier Santiago Lopez, Rafael Luis Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Santiago Morales et al v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2020cv06872
Plaintiff:
Hector Javier Santiago Lopez, Rolando Santiago Gomez, Rafael Santiago Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Gomez v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2019cv01335
Defendant:
M.D. Alexis Gendell, Correctional Officer Luis, Deputy Commissioner Leandro Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ v. AUNT DOT'S FOODS, LLC
as 4:2018cv00229
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO GOMEZ
Defendant:
AUNT DOT'S FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv16140
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
