Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hixon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv01650
Plaintiff:
Seab L. Hixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Captain Roger Wasley, Captain K. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. Sapp
as 8:2026cv02479
Plaintiff:
Corey Napoleon Smalls
Defendant:
Sapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Williams v. Sapp et al
as 0:2026cv03073
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Williams
Defendant:
Richard Sapp, Duane Southworth, Kyle Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sapp v. Abbate et al
as 2:2026cv14213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Sapp
Defendant:
Enzo A. Abbate and Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Bleistine v. Matt Meyer, et al
as 26-2405
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. BLEISTINE
Defendant:
MATT MEYER, KYLE EVANS GAY, CHAURNI PATIBANDA-SANCHEZ and others
Debtor:
GERALD W. HOCKER
Sapp v. Martin County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2026cv14204
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Sapp
Defendant:
Martin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sapp v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
as 0:2026cv02815
Plaintiff:
Jamey Sapp
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McGrone v. Birge et al
as 2:2026cv02162
Plaintiff:
Ivan McGrone
Defendant:
Matt Birge, McKenna Wenzel, . Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
(PC) Sapp v. McCarn et al
as 2:2026cv01706
Plaintiff:
Juan Sapp
Defendant:
McCarn, Rogers and J. Crowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
