Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv12307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lyon et al v. Board of Health of the Warren County Combined Health District et al
as 1:2026cv00942
Defendant:
sarah lyon, matthew james, Board of Health of the Warren County Combined Health District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ploof v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 26-6061
Plaintiff:
JESSICA PLOOF, an individual
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, a government entity, MEAGAN TAFOYA, individually and as an employee with the State of Arizona Department of Child Safety, TAFOYA, named as John Doe Tafoya, her spouse and others
Ramon v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02340
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ramon
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
D'Juan Hunter v. Bradley Butler
as 26-6974
Plaintiff:
D'JUAN HUNTER
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN BRADLEY BUTLER, Asst. Warden, CHELSEA REINHARDT, Correctional Officer II, BRADLEY MCCUE, Correctional Officer II and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
