Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00353
Plaintiff: SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant: DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff: SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant: DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: William Scott Barry
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCullen et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01852
Plaintiff: Alice McCullen , Dianne G. Addison , Margaret Allshouse and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARRY v. SOASH et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT BARRY
Defendant: BARI SOASH , JIM WILCOX and RAYCOM MEDIA INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrie v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2016cv02329
Plaintiff: Ryan Scott Barrie
Defendant: City and County of Denver, The, Denver Police Department, The, Lynette Nederhoed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrie v. Friedberg et al
as 1:2016cv02064
Plaintiff: Ryan Scott Barrie
Defendant: Jacob R. Friedberg and Jacob (I) R. Friedberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrie v. Denver Sheriff Department, The
as 1:2016cv01658
Plaintiff: Ryan Scott Barrie
Defendant: Denver Sheriff Department, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN BAREL v. KOBLISH et al
as 2:2011cv03652
Plaintiff: ADOLPHINA VAN BAREL
Defendant: ANTONY KOBLISH , WILLIAM TIDMORE , MORRIS CHESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CLAYTON v. ORTHOVITA, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03535
Plaintiff: ROBERT CLAYTON
Defendant: ORTHOVITA, INC. , R. SCOTT BARRY , MORRIS CHESTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?