Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Scott Riley et al v. Neul Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
David Scott RILEY, Novaris Communications and Novaris Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Neul Capital Holdings, LLC and Fios Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Blackmon v. Lenawee County Health Department et al
as 4:2022cv10364
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Blackmon
Defendant:
Lenawee County Health Department, Martha Hall, Blissfield Community Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25905
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03004
Plaintiff:
CAROL DANKS, KEVIN A CLAFTON, COLT BOWIE CAUMUNE and others
Defendant:
MOHAMMD JAVAD ZARIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson Tool International, Inc. v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv01540
Plaintiff:
Wilson Tool International, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Riley and Moeller Precision Tool, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Scott Hall
as 19-10352
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT RILEY HALL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Riley v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 3:2017cv00120
Petitioner:
Eugene Scott Riley
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv01519
Plaintiff:
Trevor Scott Riley
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
