Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Sean Martin v. Hugo Cadena, et al
as 23-35161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN KYLE MARTIN, AKA Sean K Bergquist
Defendant / Appellee:
HUGO FERNANDEZ CADENA, Mailroom Employee at AHCC, BONNIE LONGINO, Mailroom Employee at AHCC, TRACY SCHNEIDER, HQ Correctional Manager and others
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Martin
as 1:2021cv03096
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Sean Rierson Martin
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Martin v. Fernandez et al
as 2:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Sean Kyle Martin
Defendant:
H Fernandez, B Longino, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06349
Plaintiff:
SEAN P MARTINE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Laramie County et al
as 2:2020cv00130
Defendant:
Laramie County and Wyoming Attorney General Division of Criminal Investigation
Plaintiff:
Sean M Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Laramie County et al
as 2:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Laramie County and Wyoming Attorney General Division of Criminal Investigation
Plaintiff:
Sean M Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Martin v. Mez et al
as 2:2020cv00855
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Martin
Defendant:
Ryan Mez, Jeremy Hembree and County of Yolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Martin v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2018cv02192
Defendant:
Martinez, Fredrick, Alatorre and others
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Martin v. Rocklin Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv02172
Defendant:
Butler, Maschmeyer, Rocklin Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05116
Plaintiff:
Sean J. Martin , Richard Shanken , Tonya Shanken and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc and Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
