Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
Sean Paul Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Dalka
as 23-11162
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Sean Paul Dalka
CONLEY-REIFER v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
SKYLAR ANNABELL CONLEY-REIFER and SEAN PAUL CONLEY-REIFER
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN SNEDDON, DEPUTY WARDEN J. PASSARELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10541
Plaintiff:
SEAN PAUL MCKINLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07680
Plaintiff:
SEAN PAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
QUINTANA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
SEAN PAUL QUINTANA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Baldursdottir v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2023cv11403
Plaintiff:
Sigridur Baldursdottir
Defendant:
City of Boston, Mayor Michelle Wu, Kathleen Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
