Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 102
JUMBA BAKER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: COLLEEN JUMBA BAKER, BRITTANY MERCER, MATTHEW O'BRIEN and others
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MATTHEW LACKNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
TUCKER, EL v. SEDLAK et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: RAYA S. TUCKER, EL
Defendant: JAMES C. SEDLAK and TURTLE CREEK POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Thurman v. Sedlak, et al.
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff: Amanda Thurman
Defendant: Rachel Elizabeth Sedlak and Kyle Lee Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Thurman v. Sedlak, et al.
as 1:2023cv01442
Plaintiff: AMANDA THURMAN
Defendant: RACHEL ELIZABETH SEDLAK and KYLE LEE DARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
AGUILAR v. SEDCO CONTRACTING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01557
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER JIMENEZ AGUILAR
Defendant: SEDCO CONTRACTING, LLC and JOSEPH SEDLAK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Abrams et al v. Hairston et al
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff: Brian Abrams and Patricia Abrams
Defendant: Michelle Hairston, Brandi Sedlak and Jacque Bethke Tessendorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Timothy Sedlak v. USA
as 22-10720
Petitioner / Appellant: TIMOTHY MICHAEL SEDLAK
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Roger Sedlak
as 19-3546
Defendant / Appellant: ROGER SEDLAK
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez v. Monroe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2019cv01244
Defendant: Tracy McCoy, Ulster County, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Willie Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sedlak v. United States of America
as 6:2019cv00200
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Timothy Sedlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?