Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Amberly Williams v. ServiceSource, Inc.
as 26-2270
Plaintiff:
AMBERLY M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SERVICESOURCE, INC., JANET SAMUELSON, BRUCE PATTERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. ServiceSource, Inc., et al.
as 1:2025cv01765
Plaintiff:
Amberly M. Williams
Defendant:
ServiceSource, Inc., Janet Samuelson, Bruce Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bethel v. ServiceSource, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02305
Defendant:
ServiceSource, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennie Bethel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AKIMA INTRA-DATA, LLC v. USA
as 1:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
AKIMA INTRA-DATA, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
SERVICESOURCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Bona Fide Conglomerate, Inc. v. SourceAmerica et al
as 3:2014cv00751
Plaintiff:
Bona Fide Conglomerate, Inc.
Defendant:
SourceAmerica , Pride Industries, Inc. , Kent, Campa & Kate, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
