Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,005
Alford v. Cambre and Associates, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00993
Plaintiff: Charity Alford
Defendant: Cambre and Associates, LLC, Glenn Cambre and Candice Liverpool-Settle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Dukhan Mumin
Defendant: Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Npimnee v. Settles
as 8:2024cv00130
Petitioner: Hope T. Npimnee
Respondent: Shaun Settles
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mike Settle v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5317
Plaintiff: MIKE SETTLE
Defendant: VINCENT VANTELL, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Olden v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv03079
Plaintiff: Terrance Olden
Defendant: Cameron Avery, Scott Jackson, . French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Williams v. Settle Homes et al
as 1:2024cv02402
Plaintiff: Michael O. Williams
Defendant: Settle Homes, Marcos and Eugene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff: Danny Hopper
Defendant: Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?