Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Darby v. Jackson
as 2:2015cv01893
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Time Darby
Defendant:
Sgt Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Roach et al
as 6:2014cv01762
Plaintiff:
Travis H King
Defendant:
Kevin Roach, Sgt Jackson and Ofc Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Ms Metzen, CO II Codotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv07273
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel Estrada v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-11450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISRAEL ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE, Physician, Jackson CI, MITCHELL, Receiving Sgt. Jackson CI and others
Cain v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2012cv15582
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cain
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , B Shortidje, Sgt. Jackson and others
Peyton v. Clark et al
as 7:2012cv00481
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, D.S. Combs, Sgt. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Peyton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Toledo Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2012cv01926
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Ross
Defendant:
Toledo Correctional Institution, ODRC, Officer Burtwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. C/O Marrotta et al
as 1:2011cv03412
Plaintiff:
Pedro Sanchez
Defendant:
C/O Marrotta, Superintendent Marecie, Chief Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, W. Myers, Jeffery Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
