Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Robinson v. Alexander Correctional Inst. et al
as 5:2018ct03081
Plaintiff:
Berwyn Robinson
Defendant:
Alexander Correctional Inst. and Sgt. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v Payne et al
as 2:2017cv02275
Plaintiff:
Jessie R Lee
Defendant:
Casey Payne, Steve Kelly, Althea K Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. R.C.C. Warden Tanner et al
as 2:2017cv09298
Plaintiff:
Gator J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Warden Tanner, Sgt Harris, Christan Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Brace et al
as 3:2017cv00943
Plaintiff:
Shung Moore
Defendant:
C/O Brace, Lt. Eoavaldi, Lt. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWERY v. HARRIS
as 1:2017cv02736
Defendant:
SGT HARRIS
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Hoppensted et al
as 3:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
James Hoppensted, Lieutenant Whitley, Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. State of Maryland Department of Public Saftey and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Lonnie D Nixon
Defendant:
State of Maryland Department of Public Saftey and Correctional Services, K Landerkin, R Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Thomas v. Brian Reynolds, et al
as 16-3889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE R. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, DR. STEPHANIE STREET, executive director and others
James, 3rd v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
Ned James, 3rd
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center, William Rees, Sylvia Burler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, G Taylor, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
