Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States v. Shabazz Muhammad
as 20-3399
Defendant / Appellant:
Shabazz Muhammad, also known as Joe Bell, also known as Joe Leonard Bell, also known as Joe L. Bell, also known as Joe Leonard Bell, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Muhammad v. Entzel
as 1:2020cv01376
Petitioner:
Kaba Shabazz Muhammad
Respondent:
Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. Entzel
as 1:2019cv01343
Petitioner:
Kaba Shabazz Muhammad
Respondent:
Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Brettschneider (Scarpa)
as 19-3164
Defendant:
Scott Brettschneider, AKA Mighty Whitey, Charles Gallman, AKA T.A., Reginald Shabazz-Muhammad, AKA Reggie and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John Scarpa, Jr.
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
United States of America v. Brettschneider
as 19-2423
Defendant:
John Scarpa, Jr., Charles Gallman, AKA T.A., Reginald Shabazz-Muhammad, AKA Reggie and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Brettschneider, AKA Mighty Whitey
Muhammad v. Warden (F.C.I) (B.B.O.P.),
as 4:2019cv00186
Respondent:
Warden (F.C.I) (B.B.O.P.), and Warden (F.C.I) (F.B.O.P.)
Petitioner:
Ka'Ba Shabazz Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad-El v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dominique Malik Shabazz Muhammad-El
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government and Pamela Goodwine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Muhammad-El et al
as 2:2017mj30329
Defendant:
Albaaith Shabazz Muhammad-El and Lawrence Michael Wynn
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Muhammad-El et al
as 2:2017mj30329
Defendant:
Albaaith Shabazz Muhammad-El
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Davidson v. Baltazar
as 4:2017cv01030
Petitioner:
Muhaymin Shabazz Muhammad
Respondent:
J. Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
