Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc. v. Icon Contracting Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01917
Plaintiff:
Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Icon Contracting Group, Inc., Shakila Choudry, Shahid Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Pappas v. Shams et al
as 4:2019cv00360
Defendant:
Zia Shams, Asif Hermani, Shahid Ali and others
Plaintiff:
John C Pappas
Petitioner:
Jon Bangash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Pappas v. Shams et al
as 3:2017cv02887
Plaintiff:
John C. Pappas
Defendant:
Zia Shams , Mike Thomas, Shahid Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Howell v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2016cv06117
Plaintiff:
William Howell
Defendant:
Monroe County, Patrick O'Flynn, Ron Harling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akbar et al v. Bangash et al
as 2:2015cv12688
Plaintiff:
A. Nisar Akbar , Syed Abid , Abdul Qadir and others
Defendant:
Shaukat Bangash, Shahid Ali Bangash, Shafqat Bangash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ali v. Holder
as 13-1840
Petitioner:
Shahid Ali
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Ahmed v. Bangash et al
as 4:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Ahmed
Defendant:
Shahid Ali Bangash , Shaukat A. Bangash, Bangash Investments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ali v. Joesfowicz et al
as 4:2010cv02469
Plaintiff:
Abdus-Shahid Ali
Defendant:
Joesfowicz, Lopuhovsky and Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
