Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Bradshaw v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv10142
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
City of New York, Richard A. Brown, Dianna Megias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCIOTO PROPERTIES SP-16 LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF SHALER et al
as 2:2018cv01448
Plaintiff:
SCIOTO PROPERTIES SP-16 LLC and REMED RECOVERY CARE CENTERS LLC
Defendant:
ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SHALER and TOWNSHIP OF SHALER
Petitioner:
MARCO BONATI, ALLISON MURRAY, PATRICK MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Noble v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv04227
Plaintiff:
Loretta Denise Noble
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Employees of Georgia Department of Corrections, Tony Howerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHALER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58302
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHALER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eagle v. The Parole Board of the State of West Virginia
as 2:2011cv00008
Petitioner:
Shaler Eagle
Respondent:
The Parole Board of the State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCALEAVEY v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2010cv01034
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH MCALEAVEY, JR.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, LUCAS P. COYNE, STEVEN A. CRISANTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
