Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22768
Plaintiff:
SHARON FORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ford v. Petsmart, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01453
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ford
Defendant:
Petsmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-16402
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Ford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16402
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bannamon et al v. Iman et al
as 5:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Valparisia Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne, Wesley A. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv01816
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ford, Sharon Ford and Sharon Ford
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
