Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johnston et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Sharon Johnston and Richard McDonald
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Johnston et al
as 1:2018cv00139
Defendant:
Laroy Brisco, Sharon Johnston and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and Lawrence Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnston et al v. U.S. General Services Administration et al
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnston and Sharon Johnston
Defendant:
U.S. General Services Administration, Armed Forces Retirement Home, Laroy Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sharon Johnston v. USA
as 13-10212
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHARON JOHNSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnston v. CCS Financial Services Incorporated
as 2:2011cv00576
Plaintiff:
Sharon Johnston
Defendant:
CCS Financial Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnston v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00180
Petitioner:
Sharon Johnston
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bourne v. Harmon et al
as 5:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mark Bourne
Defendant:
Barry Harmon, John Snow, Sue Denham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LALLY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv04346
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. LALLY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN CRICHTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
