Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sanders v. City of North Las Vegas, et al.
as 26-2718
Plaintiff:
SHARON SANDERS, as the appointed special administrator of the estate of Chris Smith Jr. and Sharon Sanders
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NORTH LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT and ANTHONY MALEAR
Galloway v. Prejean et al
as 6:2025cv00857
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Galloway
Defendant:
Ashley Prejean, Ms Bouqoise, M Meche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Newsom, et al.
as 25-3272
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL LEE SMITH
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, KEVIN SEIBERT, HALLIE CAMPBELL and others
Smith v. Newsome et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Defendant:
Jeff Brown, Ryan Campbell, Kevin Seibert and others
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. City of North Las Vegas
as 2:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Sharon Renee Sanders and Sharon Sanders
Defendant:
North Las Vegas Police Department and City of North Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STONE et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03232
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN STONE, SHIRLEY ALBRIGHT, ALLEN KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders-Woods v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03721
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Sanders-Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDERS V. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00462
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
SHARON SANDERS
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Smith et al v. Target Corporation
as 0:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith , Michele Smith , Ashley Barlow and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
