Cases 1 - 10 of 76
United States of America v. Portee (Andrews)
as 23-8046
Defendant:
OMAR PORTEE, PAULETTE MCCARTHA, GARY E. JACKSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LEMREY ANDREWS, Pimp Blood Red, Pimp Bloody and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Family Dollar Stores Inc
as 1:2023cv04725
Plaintiff:
Shawn Davis
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Davis v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02186
Petitioner:
Shawn Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06352
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. PURCELL
as 2:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DAVIS
Defendant:
LINDSEY PURCELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prillerman v. Gambill et al
as 2:2022cv02707
Plaintiff:
Shayla Prillerman
Defendant:
David Gambill and Shawn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brinegar v. London, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Brinegar
Defendant:
London, Kentucky, Laurel County, Kentucky, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Che-Adkins v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frank Melvin Che-Adkins
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Travis Cathers, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57152
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
