Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robeson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02303
Plaintiff:
Shay Timeka Robeson
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shai David v. Andrew Savage, III
as 20-1775
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVAGE LAW FIRM and ANDREW JOHN SAVAGE, III
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAI DAVID
David v. Savage
as 2:2019cv03139
Defendant:
Andrew J Savage, III, Andy Savage and Savage Law Firm PA, The
Plaintiff:
Shai David
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Sweat v. Brian Sterling et al
as 2:2019cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat and Jeremy Sweat
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Michael McCall and Brian Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Boyle v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00003
Plaintiff:
Katie Shay O'Boyle
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Donald Burrell v. 911 Restoration Franchise, Inc
as 18-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BURRELL, APRIL BURRELL and 911 RESTORATION OF BALTIMORE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
911 RESTORATION FRANCHISE, INC., IDAN SHPIZEAR, PELEG LINDENBERG and others
Jeremy Shay Sweat v. Warden Broad River
as 17-7123
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY SHAY SWEAT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Burrell et al v. 911 Restoration Franchise, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02278
Plaintiff:
Ms. April Burrell, 911 Restoration of Baltimore, Inc., Mr. Donald C Burrell and others
Defendant:
Mr. Idan Shpizear, 911 Restoration Franchise, Inc., Mr. Shay Kalmanovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey
as 17-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK MORRISEY, SUE ROBEY, J. COURRIER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
