Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Seidenfeld et al v. Munoz
as 1:2026cv05717
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Shea Seidenfeld, Rabbi Simon A. Indig, CONG KHAL BNAI YISSUCHOR OF RIBOTITCH and others
Defendant:
SANDRA M. MUNOZ, in her official capacity and on the behalf herself and on behalf of all other New York State Supreme Court Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv04001
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Harjani, et al v. GGP-Natick West L.L.C., et al
as 26-2053
Plaintiff:
HITESH HARJANI, NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO and GATSBY'S CHOP HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
GGP-NATICK WEST L.L.C., BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES, NICHOLAS MARONA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03969
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. CIR
as 26-60753
Petitioner:
Shea Monique Jones
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03966
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03950
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03916
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shea v. Economy Premier Assurance Company
as 3:2026cv02546
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shea
Defendant:
Economy Premier Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
US v. Shea Roseboro, Jr.
as 26-4445
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHEA ANTHONY ROSEBORO, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
