Cases 41 - 50 of 4,282
Loyde v. Odom et al
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Ed Henry Loyde
Defendant:
Sheriff Odom, John Doe - Officer, Jane Doe - Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vines v. Calhoun County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
George Taylor Carl Vines
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff Department and Steven Hinkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Damrell v. Richmond PD et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Derick Damrell
Defendant:
Richmond PD, Richmond Sheriffs Department and Madison County DPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Landhandle
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kasey Landhandle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dearing v. Morristown Police Department et al (JRG2)
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
John B. Dearing
Defendant:
Morristown Police Department, Hamblen County Sheriff's Department, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Batts et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Quinton Antario King
Defendant:
Nicholas Batts, Hickman County Sheriff's Office and Joey Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardiman v. McConnell et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cory Dustin Hardiman
Defendant:
Sheriff Joyce McConnell, Vicky Afisov, Sandy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Nathan L Baker
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Sheriff Jerry Greene, Warden Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
