Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Mikush v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Mikush
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hammons v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lyn Hammons
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Newman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Newman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McIntyre v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv40095
Plaintiff:
Sheryle Katherine McIntyre
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Sheryl White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weber v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ann Weber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buchheit v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Buchheit
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Larson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Larson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Peterson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ann Peterson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Spence v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Spence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
