Cases 1 - 10 of 593
Lieberman et al v. ADI DAGAN et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Dr. Isador Lieberman, KENNETH CORRADO, DR. PAUL HOLMAN and others
Defendant:
ADI DAGAN and D.I. DAGAN CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Federal Trade Commission v. Doxo Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Doxo, Inc., Steve Shivers and Roger Parks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Doxo, Inc., Steve Shivers and Roger Parks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Dixon v. Shiver et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joey Dixon
Defendant:
Blake Shiver and Georgia State Patrol Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. SHIVER et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
JOEY DIXON
Defendant:
BLAKE SHIVER and GEORGIA STATE PATROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Rossiter et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Melissa Webb
Defendant:
Stephen Rossiter, Jamaul Jackson, Jared Columbine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shivers v. Hooper
as 24-30198
Petitioner:
Cordell Shivers
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Shivers #718470 v. Briske et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Devon Shivers #718470
Defendant:
Unknown Briske, Unknown Porter, Nicki Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shivers #718470 v. Mackey et al
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Devon Shivers #718470
Defendant:
Unknown Mackey and Unknown Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Shiver v. Taurus International Manufacturing Inc., et al
as 24-10730
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHIVER
Defendant:
TAURUS INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING INC. and TAURUS HOLDINGS INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
