Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Chapman v. Skipper
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Greg Chapman
Defendant:
Caleb Skipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Felicia Morgan v. City of Charlotte
as 23-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELICIA MORGAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem of other Bobby Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, EDWARD GONZALEZ, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer with CMPD, DEREK RUD, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer with CMPD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baugh et al v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Paul David Baugh, Jr., David Dudley, Carl Skipper and others
Defendant:
Austal U.S.A., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baugh et al v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Paul David Baugh, Jr., David Dudley, Carl Skipper and others
Defendant:
Austal USA, LLC and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
