Cases 1 - 10 of 2,351
Smith v. McClean et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Joan McClean, Officer Todd Tallant, Does Badge Number 11-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Poffenbarger v. Frank Kendall, III, et al
as 24-3417
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POFFENBARGER, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT I. MILLER, in his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force, LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD W. SCOBEE, in his official capacity as Commander, Air Force Reserve Command and others
Smith v. Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv21842
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv21845
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Federico I. Lopez and Miami-Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Enriquez
as 1:2024cv21843
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Javier A. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Smith, Jr. v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SMITH, JR. v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 2:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
ENOS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
