Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Behlmann v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan Behlmann
Defendant:
Martin, Sokolov, Polard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Hankins v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hankins
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Gregory Sokolov, Dr. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meany et al v. Atomic Protocol Systems OU et al
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Robert Meany, Graham Dickinson, John Briscoe and others
Defendant:
Atomic Wallet, Konstantin Gladych, Konstantin Gladyshev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARKS & SOKOLOV LLC v. FRANCINVEST, S.A.
as 2:2023cv02534
Plaintiff:
MARKS & SOKOLOV LLC
Defendant:
FRANCINVEST, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Sokolove Law Firm et al
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Wingrove Felton Robinson
Defendant:
Sokolove Law Firm, Motley Rice, Mary Spikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
