Cases 41 - 50 of 354
Hicks v. Springs Window Fashions, LLC
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
David Hicks
Defendant:
Springs Window Fashions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nader v. Springs Window Fashions, LLC
as 1:2022cv12067
Plaintiff:
Jim Nader
Defendant:
Springs Window Fashions, LLC
Stovall et al v. Springs Window Fashions, LLC
as 1:2022cv03551
Plaintiff:
Leonard Stovall and Mark Eversole
Defendant:
Springs Window Fashions, LLC
McClintock v. Springs Window Fashions LLC
as 3:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McClintock
Defendant:
Springs Window Fashions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pantoja v. Bechtold et al
as 2:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
Angela D Pantoja
Defendant:
Lisa M Bechtold, Brian R Bechtold and Laurel Springs School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Askew v. Spring Windows Fashions, LLC
as 4:2022cv02881
Plaintiff:
Valerie Askew
Defendant:
Spring Windows Fashions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LaBracio v. Springs Window Fashions, LLC
as 3:2022cv01326
Plaintiff:
Richard LaBracio
Defendant:
Springs Window Fashions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Yisrael v. Beckett Springs, LLC
as 1:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Tsipporah Yisrael
Defendant:
Beckett Springs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pugh et al v. Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Aubray Pugh, Olivia Lees and Cassidy Elliott
Defendant:
Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC, Lady Jane's Murfreesboro TN, LLC and Lady Jane's Nashville-Cool Springs TN, LLC, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia-Ascanio v. Spring Indep Sch Dist
as 22-20363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Arturo Garcia-Ascanio
Defendant / Appellee:
Spring Independent School District
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
