Cases 1 - 10 of 6,113
Johnson v. MNSF II WI LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Kasha Louise Johnson
Defendant:
MNSF II WI LLC, Bridge & SFR IV Seed Borrower, Bridge Investment Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tyler v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Stacey A. Tyler
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Uhrig v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dustin Uhrig
Defendant:
Trooper C Johnson, Tropper William Howard, Stacey Sanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perkins Rock et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04833
Plaintiff:
Stacey Perkins Rock and Paul Rock
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Martin v. The City of Las Vegas et al
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bernard Martin
Defendant:
The City of Las Vegas, Judge Linda Marquis, Dalia Marina-Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oren Stacey
Defendant:
William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Artrip
as 24-6559
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
WARDEN ARTRIP, INVESTIGATOR HARRIS, ASSISTANT WARDEN BLEVINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
