Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Skelton v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01268
Plaintiff:
Karlheinz Skelton
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Stapleton v. Parsons et al
as 7:2026cv00632
Plaintiff:
David E. Stapleton
Defendant:
Gary Parsons and Sgt. Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Stanley v. Carey
as 1:2026cv09411
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Stanley
Defendant:
Margaret Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Stanley v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County
as 4:2026cv08154
Petitioner:
Rodric P. Stanley, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court of Contra Costa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nehad Abdelnabi v. Stanley Lovett
as 26-5679
Petitioner:
NEHAD S. ABDELNABI
Respondent:
STANLEY LOVETT, Warden
RanchlandMTX, LLC v. CWCapital Asset Management, LLC et al
as 7:2026cv00290
Plaintiff:
RanchlandMTX, LLC
Defendant:
CWCapital Asset Management, LLC, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., Multifamily Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2019-K93, 1212 East Wadley Avenue Holdings Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stanley v. Hollandberry et al
as 3:2026cv07958
Plaintiff:
Rodric P. Stanley, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Hollandberry and Contra Costa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. AGBOASI
as 5:2026cv00325
Petitioner:
STANLEY LENARD MALONE
Respondent:
MARK AGBOASI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
