Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
State of Delaware v. BP America Inc, et al
as 22-1096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA INC, BP PLC, CHEVRON CORP and others
Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES, UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, PUBLIC CITIZEN INC and others
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re:
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent:
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al v. President United States, et al
as 19-1129
Undetermined:
PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND, PROFESSOR CARL H. ESBECK, PROFESSOR RICHARD EPSTEIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner / Appellant:
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al v. President United States, et al
as 19-1189
Undetermined:
PROFESSOR DAVID F.FORTE, PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND, PROFESSOR RICHARD EPSTEIN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05073
Plaintiff:
STATE OF WISCONSIN , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
INDIVIOR INC. , RECKITTBENCHISER HEALTHCARE (UK) LTD. , INDIVIOR PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04234
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF OHIO , STATE OF VERMONT and others
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
