Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sergio Robinson v. Officer Twisdale
as 23-1562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGIO LEMARE ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER TWISDALE, Badge #5233, OFFICER STEFANIK, Badge #5828 and others
ELLISON v. GOGA et al
as 2:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLISON
Defendant:
JACOB GOGA, STEPHEN PAPUGA and JOHN STEFANIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Baltimore County Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
Sergio Lemare Robinson
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Department, Officer Twisdale, Officer Stefanik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Iheanacho v. Baltimore County et al
as 1:2021cv00560
Plaintiff:
Golden C. Iheanacho
Defendant:
Melissa R. Hyatt, Baltimore County and Paul Andrew Stefanik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stefanik v. Willis, et al
as 09-1918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEFANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWN WILLIS, KAREN BETOURNAY, DAN V. BAIR, II and others
Stefanik v. City Of Holyoke, et al
as 09-1905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEFANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOLYOKE, JOHN HART, LAURENCE P. COURNOYER, JR. and others
Thomas Stefanik v. City Of Holyoke, et al
as 09-1843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEFANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOLYOKE, SHAWN WILLIS, Individual capacity, KAREN BETOURNAY and others
Turk et al v. Oiler et al
as 1:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Turk and Marybeth Turk
Defendant:
Brian Oiler, Adam Rabak, Frank Nosal and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stefanik v. City of Holyoke, et al
as 3:2008cv30136
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stefanik
Defendant:
City of Holyoke, Shawn Willis, Karen Betournay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stefanik v. Willis et al
as 3:2008cv30107
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stefanik
Defendant:
Shawn Willis, Shawn Willis, Dan V. Bair, II and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
