Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Koplow
as 21-1638
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Respondent:
DANA WILLIAM, GERALD FABIANO, LAW FIRM OF PIERCE, DAVIS, PERRITANO and others
Appellee:
LEO ROBINSON
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornwell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2016cv11554
Plaintiff:
Brian Cornwell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Plymouth District Court, Plymouth County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cornwell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2016cv10948
Plaintiff:
Brian Cornwell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Plymouth District Court, Plymouth County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McElyea v. Kerns et al
as 3:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
Charles H. McElyea, Jr.
Defendant:
Allen Kerns, Stephen Powers, Eric Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McElyea v. Dickson County et al
as 3:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles H. McElyea, Jr.
Defendant:
Dickson County, Allen D. Kerns, Stephen Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McElyea v. Dickson County et al
as 3:2013mc00018
Plaintiff:
Charles H. McElyea, Jr.
Defendant:
Dickson County, Allen D. Kerns, Stephen Powers and others
POWERS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2010cv00243
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN POWERS
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
