Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johns v. Corrections Medicine et al
as 4:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
Brent Jeffrey Johns
Defendant:
Corrections Medicine, St. Louis County Health Dept., Steve Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johns v. St. Louis County Health Dept. et al
as 4:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Brent Jeffrey Johns
Defendant:
St. Louis County Health Dept., St. Louis County Jail, Steve Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petit et al v. National Hockey League et al
as 0:2015cv03666
Plaintiff:
Michel Petit , Steve Payne , Kurt Walker and others
Defendant:
National Hockey League, NHL Enterprises, Inc. and National Hockey League Board of Governors
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 2:2013cv00273
Petitioner:
Eddie Williams, Jr
Respondent:
Sharon Taylor, Todd Wiggins, Craig Jullian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw et al v. Ortho Mattress, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Keith Crenshaw , Steve Payne and Ben Gore
Defendant:
Ortho Mattress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Payne
as 1:2010cv02266
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Steve Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Childress et al v. Air Products and Chemicals Inc
as 6:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
Benjamin C Childress, Benjamin C Childress, Boyce Stroud and others
Defendant:
Air Products and Chemicals Inc and Air Products and Chemicals Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wallace v. Carlton et al
as 2:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
Chester L Wallace
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Joseph Shepherd, Steve Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southern Wildlife Seeds v. Payne et al
as 2:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Steve Payne, Steve Payne, Southern Wildlife Seeds and others
Defendant:
Buck Island Seed Company, Genesis Wildlife Products, Berry Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
