Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Michael Gordon v. Margaret Haurbrick, et al
as 09-4065
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL L. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee: MARGARET HAURBRICK, DAVID BOSLEY, KEVIN W. HORAN and others
Steve Bader v. Larry Norris
as 09-3102
Petitioner: Steve Scott Bader
Respondent: Larry Norris
Bader v. Norris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00218
Petitioner: Steve Scott Bader
Respondent: Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brady v. Marion City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff: Terry L Brady
Defendant: Marion City of, Marion Police Department and Steve Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORDON v. HAURBRICK et al
as 2:2009cv00060
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Defendant: MARGARET HAURBRICK, DAVID BOSLEY, KEVIN HORAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tom Brown, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 08-16083
Plaintiff - Appellant: MULTI DENOMINATIONAL MINISTRY OF CANNABIS AND RASTAFARI, INC., LINDA SENTI, Rev., TOM BROWN, Rev. and others
Appellant: CHARLES E. LEPP, Personal Representative of Linda Senti
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, KAREN TANDY, Administrator DEA, SCOTT MCGREGOR, U.S. Attorney and others
Scott v. Thurston Woods Village, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00419
Plaintiff: Steve Scott
Defendant: Thurston Woods Village, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steve Bader v. Larry Norris
as 08-1380
Petitioner: Steve Scott Bader
Respondent: Larry Norris, A.D.C. Director
Steven Bader v. Larry Norris
as 08-1225
Petitioner - Appellant: Steve Scott Bader
Respondent - Appellee: Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Bader v. Norris
as 5:2007cv00321
Plaintiff: Steve Scott Bader
Defendant: Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?