Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Webb v. Circle K Stores Incorporated
as 2:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Steve Webb
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kirkpatrick v. Knox County Government et al
as 3:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Knox County Government, Grainger County Detention Facility, Steven Sword and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Kirkpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Knox Co Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Mary Shelly, Tom Spangler, Knox Co Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Randy D Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Higgs v. Webb et al
as 1:2014cv01046
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eric Higgs
Defendant:
Steve Webb, Jeff Maitland and Charles W. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co
as 3:2013cv00554
Plaintiff:
Steve Webb
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co
Counter_claimant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co
Counter_defendant:
Steve Webb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Steve Webb v. C David Webb et al
as 2:2011cv08299
Respondent:
C David Webb and Lee O Webb
Petitioner:
Steve Webb
Webb v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2011cv02510
Plaintiff:
Steve Webb
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus Jones v. BOP, et al
as 11-6091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DEANGELO JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
BOP, JUAN CASTILLO, Warden, FCI Memphis Warden, S. DAWSON, Assistant Warden and others
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv02312
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeAngelo Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Juan Castillo, S. Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
