Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Brown v. Kids Voice of Indiana et al
as 3:2026cv00484
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant:
Kids Voice of Indiana, Joshua Paul Stien and Indiana Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gokhberg et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2025cv00384
Plaintiff:
Yury Gokhberg and Tatyana Gavrikova
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Select Portfolio Services, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Redcrow v. Montana Women's Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Defendant:
Jennie Hansen, Montana Women's Prison, Nurse Pam and others
Plaintiff:
Lucy Marie Redcrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponze v. Montana Women's Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Natasha Love Ponze
Defendant:
Ben Fry, Dr. MacMurry, C.O. Sincoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanasa v. Stiene
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LANASA, TSR, LLC and DUNGEON HOBBY SHOP MUSEUM, LLC
Defendant:
ERIK STIENE and RACHEL STIENE
WHITFIELD v. STIEN et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STIEN, HARTZEL, ABNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stiens v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv06125
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Stiens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lanasa et al v. Stiene
as 1:2022cv05686
Plaintiff:
Justin Lanasa, TSR, LLC and Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum LLC
Defendant:
Erik Stiene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Tracy v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05162
Plaintiff:
Max Daniel Tracy
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johanson, Travis Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
